• Support Us
  • Whole Child Model
School-to-School InternationalSchool-to-School InternationalSchool-to-School InternationalSchool-to-School International
  • Home
  • About STS
  • Our People
  • Our Expertise
  • Where We Work
  • STS Spotlight

When Evaluating EdTech Interventions

    Home STS Blog When Evaluating EdTech Interventions
    NextPrevious

    When Evaluating EdTech Interventions

    By STS | STS Blog | 0 comment | 11 October, 2021 | 10

    Our field knows that girls across the globe have greater difficulty than boys in accessing quality education. Today’s International Day of the Girl—commemorated with the theme Digital Generation. Our Generation.—highlights the technological gender gap.

    Girls have more difficulty accessing the internet, using and owning fewer devices, and are less likely to pursue careers in tech.1 Many education groups have made efforts to engage girls in tech from an early age, incorporating tech and apps into interventions. But what do we know about how effective such interventions are in closing the digital gender gap?

    To mark this year’s #DayoftheGirl, we want to share some considerations STS uses for evaluating EdTech interventions—and some tech we think is beneficial for assessing girls’ education outcomes.

    When evaluating EdTech interventions, we consider the following questions with a lens of gender equality and social inclusion (GESI).

    • What are gender norms around girls and technology in the context that we will be evaluating? How might this have affected the intervention?
    • To what extent did the intervention incorporate the minimum gender standards?2
    • Did the intervention address barriers to girls’ access to, control over, and benefits from tech resources?
    • Did the intervention increase girls’ understanding of their rights and their ability to determine their life outcomes? Did it also influence their decision-making?

    We are also making efforts to incorporate tech innovations that improve our research. Some promising new approaches for evaluating interventions and programs that target girls include chatbots, participatory technology, and data collection led by girls.

    • Interventions have mainly used chatbots to disseminate information because they harness the reach of social media. Chatbots also have great potential as survey tools. Girls may feel more comfortable sharing information about sensitive topics and behaviors with a chatbot than with an enumerator.
    • Participatory technology could be useful in evaluating girls’ education interventions. Girls may feel more empowered by using these techniques to provide data. In turn, the findings may be richer and more nuanced because they capture girls’ experiences in their own voices.
    • Finally, data collection led by girls provides a unique way for girls to participate in evaluations. When girls collect data from their peers, they can gather real-time insights into their counterparts’ lives and shape evaluations’ priorities.
    Beneficial Tech Innovations

    Notable chatbots include Lucybot for sexual and reproductive health, Momconnect for pregnancy, TESSA for job searching, and Miss Migration for safe migration.

    Interesting examples of participatory technology include participatory video, video diaries, and PhotoVoice.

    A leading example of girl-led data collection is TEGA.

    Asking questions about EdTech’s impact on girls enables us (as external evaluators) to do our job more effectively. It also creates opportunities that can build girls’ confidence, increase their exposure to technology, and ultimately reduce the digital gender gap.

    Today’s post was authored by Anne Laesecke, Evaluation & Research Associate, and Drew Schmenner, Sr. Data and Technical Writing Associate.

    Digital Divide, Gender Divide, International Day of the Girl, Research and Evaluation

    Leave a Comment

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    NextPrevious

    Subscribe and Learn More

    STS Staff Spotlight

    Briona Graham-Clayton

    Program Coordinator

    STS Project Spotlight

    Remote EGRA for Learners who are Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing

    policy and planning research and evaluation

    View more

    Remote EGRA for Learners who are Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing

    policy and planning research and evaluation

    Remote EGRA for Learners who are Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing

    policy and planning research and evaluation

    Remote EGRA for Learners who are Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing

    Remote EGRA for Learners who are Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing
    2021-11-15

    Connect

    Subscribe

    Subscribe for newsletters and WCM updates.

    Contact

    Questions? Comments? Want to get involved? Contact us.

    Careers

    Take the next step in your career with STS. Apply.

    • Home
    • Whole Child Model
    • About STS
    • Our People
    • Our Expertise
    • Where We Work
    • STS Spotlight
    • Support Us
    • Contact Us
    School-to-School International